The magical reading lens is the one I understand the most and catches my interest because the magical reading lens talks about conflict, realism and fantasy combined.
The critical reading lens i understand best, is archetypal criticism, because it is intriguing how every story is related but similar at the same time. I would be looking for the protagonist, the antagonist, and whats the problem in the story. I would also need to locate the resolution.
The critical reading theory that I prefer is Formalist Criticism. I myself like to break down the text into sections, to fully understand what the story is saying.
The critical reading lens that I understand the most is feminist criticism. Through this lens I’m looking for more understanding of how women are seen in other peoples eyes.
The critical reading lens I understand best is Reader-Response Criticism. Through this lens I’m an looking for various ways that’ll help me relate to the story for better understanding.
i understand the psychological and psychoanalytic criticism the best. through these lens, i am looking for literature expressed through an other’s mind, feelings, and personality.
I understand the Id, Ego and Super ego criticism the best and I also like Jung-Archetypes criticism. By looking through the id, ego and superego lens I going to understand the character’s mental thoughts, and personality.
the critical reading lens that I understand the most is the reader response lens, i also understand the gender criticism but it will be a little difficult because I’m not a woman to express what an actual woman will be related to poems or other readings. Also, what I’m looking forward through the reader response lense is finding connections with authors, poems and other readings.
My top two favorite critical reading lenses would have to be Archetypical and Magical. They both just really catch my interest, Archetypical talks about hell and dark stuff, that kind of stuff really makes me want to read more. Magical talks about two conflicting perspectives and most of the shows I enjoy are like that.
The critical reading lens that best stood out towards me were the ideas of,”The ID,ego,and super ego” and feminism” the idea of the id brings this whole perspective of how they correlate towards how we develop our personality. What i am expecting from this is a sense of reassurance from society .
The critical reading lens I understand best is Feminist Criticism. Through this lens I am looking for a feminine touch to any novel I read and any underhanded comments of women and how they are perceived in past and present society.
The critical reading lens i understand best is magical realism. The one im looking forward too is archtypes.
The magical reading lens is the one I understand the most and catches my interest because the magical reading lens talks about conflict, realism and fantasy combined.
The critical reading lens i understand best, is archetypal criticism, because it is intriguing how every story is related but similar at the same time. I would be looking for the protagonist, the antagonist, and whats the problem in the story. I would also need to locate the resolution.
The critical reading theory that I prefer is Formalist Criticism. I myself like to break down the text into sections, to fully understand what the story is saying.
I like Psychoanalytic criticism because it encourages me to analyze what I read more throughly.
I understand the Jung Archetypes reading lens best. Through this lens I’m looking for clichés about the main character’s journey
I choosed reader response because I can connect with the poems or articles.
The critical reading lens that I understand the most is feminist criticism. Through this lens I’m looking for more understanding of how women are seen in other peoples eyes.
The critical reading lens I understand best is Reader-Response Criticism. Through this lens I’m an looking for various ways that’ll help me relate to the story for better understanding.
i understand the psychological and psychoanalytic criticism the best. through these lens, i am looking for literature expressed through an other’s mind, feelings, and personality.
I understand the Id, Ego and Super ego criticism the best and I also like Jung-Archetypes criticism. By looking through the id, ego and superego lens I going to understand the character’s mental thoughts, and personality.
Psychoanalytical Criticism
You are looking for the emotional aspect to the piece of work, you are looking into the authors mind and their feelings.
i read about formalist criticism and they help us be more thoughtful
an careful readers.
the critical reading lens that I understand the most is the reader response lens, i also understand the gender criticism but it will be a little difficult because I’m not a woman to express what an actual woman will be related to poems or other readings. Also, what I’m looking forward through the reader response lense is finding connections with authors, poems and other readings.
My top two favorite critical reading lenses would have to be Archetypical and Magical. They both just really catch my interest, Archetypical talks about hell and dark stuff, that kind of stuff really makes me want to read more. Magical talks about two conflicting perspectives and most of the shows I enjoy are like that.
I understand best the Jung Archetypes.
You are looking for the main character and the journey he experiences.
The critical reading lens that best stood out towards me were the ideas of,”The ID,ego,and super ego” and feminism” the idea of the id brings this whole perspective of how they correlate towards how we develop our personality. What i am expecting from this is a sense of reassurance from society .
My first choice to practice is the ID, Ego and Superego; my second would be Marxist criticism.
Why?
feminist criticism
Why?
the critical reading lens i understand best is the feminism one. I am looking forward to the females perspective.
The critical reading lens I understand best is Feminist Criticism. Through this lens I am looking for a feminine touch to any novel I read and any underhanded comments of women and how they are perceived in past and present society.
can’t do it.